This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Authors' Responses to Peer-Reviews (84)

Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/37170, first published .
Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”

Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”

Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”

Authors of this article:

Diane M Korngiebel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kathleen McGlone West1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Korngiebel D, West K. Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”. JMIRx Med 2022;3(2):e37170 View
  2. . Peer Review of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”. JMIRx Med 2022;3(2):e38486 View
  3. . Peer Review of “Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet”. JMIRx Med 2022;3(2):e37323 View