Authors' Response to Peer-Review Reports: https://med.jmirx.org/2021/3/e32248/
Published Article: https://med.jmirx.org/2021/3/e30233/
This is a peer-review report submitted for the paper “Technologies to Support Assessment of Movement During Video Consultations: Exploratory Study.”
Round 1 Review
This paper  is an exploratory study on technologies to support video consultations assessing movement. It is not clear whether it explored the technology itself or the process of using various technologies.
1. It is not clear why 4 specific devices were chosen and there is no explanation of the most widely used software. Is it technology or device exploration?
2. I was unable to identify clearly whether the hypothetical patients were physiotherapists or family members. Were the hypothetical patients briefed on what they should present for inference, or was the clinical condition identified as they presented?
3. How many hypothetical patients took part in the study?
4. The experiences of the hypothetical patients were not detailed.
Conflicts of Interest
Edited by E Meinert; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 20.07.21; accepted 20.07.21; published 24.09.21Copyright
©Immanuel Victor George. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 24.09.2021.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.