JMIRxMed JMIRx Med JMIRx Med 2563-6316 JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada v2i3e32263 10.2196/32263 Peer-Review Report Peer-Review Report Peer Review of “Technologies to Support Assessment of Movement During Video Consultations: Exploratory Study” Meinert Edward George Immanuel Victor MSN, PGDANP 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-608X NHS WWL Foundation Trust Wigan United Kingdom Jul-Sep 2021 24 9 2021 2 3 e32263 20 7 2021 20 7 2021 ©Immanuel Victor George. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 24.09.2021. 2021

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

 https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30233 https://med.jmirx.org/2021/3/e32248/ https://med.jmirx.org/2021/3/e30233/ tele-rehabilitation video-consultations assessment of movement eHealth technology desktop robots wide-angle webcams physical health rehabilitation remote assessment assistive technology evaluation framework webcam telehealth robots

This is a peer-review report submitted for the paper “Technologies to Support Assessment of Movement During Video Consultations: Exploratory Study.”

Round 1 Review General Comments

This paper [1] is an exploratory study on technologies to support video consultations assessing movement. It is not clear whether it explored the technology itself or the process of using various technologies.

 Specific Comments Major Comments

1. It is not clear why 4 specific devices were chosen and there is no explanation of the most widely used software. Is it technology or device exploration?

2. I was unable to identify clearly whether the hypothetical patients were physiotherapists or family members. Were the hypothetical patients briefed on what they should present for inference, or was the clinical condition identified as they presented?

3. How many hypothetical patients took part in the study?

 Minor Comments

4. The experiences of the hypothetical patients were not detailed.

None declared.

 Jones RB Hubble S Taylor L Gunn H Logan A Rowland T Bradwell H Connolly L Algie k Anil K Halliday B Houston S Dennett R Chatfield S Buckingham S Freeman J Technologies to support assessment of movement during video consultations: exploratory study JMIRx Med 2021 09 2 3 e30233 10.2196/30233