This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

#xPublicandGlobalHealth (33) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2388) Theme Issue: Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak Rapid Reports (1482) Digital Contact Tracing, Digital Proximity Tracing, Precision Public Health (138) Outbreak and Pandemic Preparedness and Management (1673) Infectious Diseases (non-STD/STI) (1480) Innovative Methods in Public Health and Surveillance (305)

Published on in Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249749v1, first published .
Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review

Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review

Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Mathew Mbwogge1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (19) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Roy A. Peer Review of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”. JMIRx Med 2021;2(2):e28719 View
  2. Asgari Mehrabadi M. Peer Review of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”. JMIRx Med 2021;2(2):e28745 View
  3. Mbwogge M. Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”. JMIRx Med 2021;2(2):e28744 View
  4. Mendez-Brito A, El Bcheraoui C, Pozo-Martin F. Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19. Journal of Infection 2021;83(3):281 View
  5. Mbwogge M, Astbury N, Nkumbe H, Bunce C, Bascaran C. Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre-Post Quality Improvement Intervention. JMIRx Med 2022;3(3):e34263 View
  6. Afroogh S, Esmalian A, Mostafavi A, Akbari A, Rasoulkhani K, Esmaeili S, Hajiramezanali E. Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-19. Ethics and Information Technology 2022;24(3) View
  7. Qaqish B, Sallam M, Al-Khateeb M, Reisdorf E, Mahafzah A. Assessment of COVID-19 Molecular Testing Capacity in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study at the Country Level. Diagnostics 2022;12(4):909 View
  8. Mbwogge M, Kumar P, Abhishek K. A Metasynthesis and Meta-analysis of the Impact and Diagnostic Safety of COVID-19 Symptom Agnostic Rapid Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e41132 View
  9. Cheshmehzangi A, Zou T. Discourse on COVID-19 Mass Testing vs. Rapid Testing Processing. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  10. Tanaka T, Nihonsugi T, Ohtake F, Haruno M. A message of the majority with scientific evidence encourages young people to show their prosocial nature in COVID-19 vaccination. Scientific Reports 2021;11(1) View
  11. Heaton D, Clos J, Nichele E, Fischer J. Critical reflections on three popular computational linguistic approaches to examine Twitter discourses. PeerJ Computer Science 2023;9:e1211 View
  12. Mannier C, Yoon J. Progression of LAMP as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is PCR Finally Rivaled?. Biosensors 2022;12(7):492 View
  13. Heijmink L, Tönis J, Gilhuis N, Gerkema M, Hart L, Raven S, van den Boogaard J, Hofhuis A, van den Hof S, Visser O. Epidemiological evaluation of mass testing in a small municipality in the Netherlands during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Epidemiology and Infection 2022;150 View
  14. Amicosante A, Rosso A, Bernardini F, Guglielmi E, Eugeni E, Da Re F, Baglio G. COVID-19 Contact Tracing Strategies During the First Wave of the Pandemic: Systematic Review of Published Studies. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2023;9:e42678 View
  15. Paulo M, Peyroteo M, Maia M, Pries C, Habl C, Lapão L. Impacts of public health and social measures on COVID-19 in Europe: a review and modified Delphi technique. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  16. Heaton D, Nichele E, Clos J, Fischer J. “The pingdemic has been a greater challenge than Covid itself”: semantic prosodies in UK newspaper articles during the pandemic. SN Social Sciences 2023;3(9) View
  17. Heaton D, Nichele E, Clos J, Fischer J. Perceptions of the Agency and Responsibility of the NHS COVID-19 App on Twitter: Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e50388 View
  18. Fadlallah R, El‐Jardali F, Karroum L, Kalach N, Hoteit R, Aoun A, Al‐Hakim L, Verdugo‐Paiva F, Rada G, Fretheim A, Lewin S, Ludolph R, Akl E. The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods 2024;2(5) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Gresham L, Alemu W, Divi N, Alhusseini N, Awoniyi O, Bashir A, Shaikh A, McNabb S. Modernizing Global Health Security to Prevent, Detect, and Respond. View