Authors' Response to Peer-Review Reports: https://med.jmirx.org/2025/1/e83474
Published Article: https://med.jmirx.org/2025/1/e68376
doi:10.2196/83476
Keywords
This is a peer-review report for “Real-World Performance of COVID-19 Antigen Tests: Predictive Modeling and Laboratory-Based Validation.”
Round 1 Review
This is a good paper [] that models the performance of antigen tests.
Minor Comments
- It would be good to include a schematic/analysis/methods and an image of how the lateral flow assays look and how test band intensities are obtained. Was that done with ImageJ?
- An interesting aspect of the paper is the comparison between trained eye versus user of lateral flow assays (Figure 5). I think that adding a paragraph about the conclusions from that figure might be good in the Discussion section.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Reference
- Bosch M, Garcia D, Rudtner L, et al. Real-world performance of COVID-19 antigen tests: predictive modeling and laboratory-based validation. JMIRx Med. 2025;6:e68376. [CrossRef]
Edited by Fuqing Wu; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 03.Sep.2025; accepted 03.Sep.2025; published 06.Oct.2025.
Copyright© Helena de Puig. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 6.Oct.2025.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.