This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Peer Reviews (268)

Published on in Vol 6 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/79521, first published .
Peer Review of “Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship: Retrospective Cohort Study”

Peer Review of “Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship: Retrospective Cohort Study”

Peer Review of “Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship: Retrospective Cohort Study”

Authors of this article:

Archana Adhikari1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    Related ArticlesPreprint (biomedRxiv): https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.10.24311795v1
    Authors' Response to Peer-Review Reports: https://med.jmirx.org/2025/1/e79672
    Published Article: https://med.jmirx.org/2025/1/e65299
    JMIRx Med 2025;6:e79521

    doi:10.2196/79521

    Keywords

    cardiotoxicity; cardiology; cardiovascular; heart; arrhythmias; self-reported questionnaires; oncology; survivors; pediatrics; prevalence; incidence; risk; epidemiology; anthracycline exposure; childhood cancer survivors 

    This is a peer-review report for “Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship: Retrospective Cohort Study.”


    General Comments

    This paper [1] gives valuable insights into cardiotoxicity in pediatric cancer survivorship: patterns, predictors, and implications for long-term care. The results and methodology are sound. However, some minor revisions would improve clarity and strengthen the overall impact of this paper. Below are my suggestions.

    Major Comments

    1. Method section (study population and data source): In the Method section, specifically the fourth line, the description “of 21 at one of 31 participating institutes” is unclear. The sentence should be revised for better clarity.
    2. Missing answer for seventh objective: The answer to the seventh objective is unclear.

    Minor Comments

    1. Result presentation: It would be better if the results were presented in tabular format for easier comprehension. A table would help summarize the key findings and increase readability.
    2. Clarity in results numbering: To improve clarity, it would be beneficial to present all the results with corresponding numbers, matching each result with the respective objective number for easier reference and alignment.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Mansoor M, Ibrahim A. Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship: Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIRx Med. 2025;6:e65299. [CrossRef]

    Edited by Fuqing Wu; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 23.06.25; accepted 23.06.25; published 31.07.25.

    Copyright

    © Archana Adhikari. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 31.7.2025.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.