This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Peer Reviews (242)

Published on in Vol 6 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/69594, first published .
Peer Review for “Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study”

Peer Review for “Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study”

Peer Review for “Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study”

Authors of this article:

Sai Saripalli1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics


    This is the peer-review report for “Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study.”


    General Comments

    Using artificial intelligence (AI) to add social and domain-specific steps to clinical trials is innovative [1]. My only comment is whether the number of stages or the checklist changes if the shortlisted panelists change.

    Specific Comments

    Major Comments

    1. I am unsure if having 38 (expert) panelists is good enough to have a robust framework.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Owoyemi A, Osuchukwu J, Salwei ME, Boyd A. Checklist approach to developing and implementing AI in clinical settings: instrument development study. JMIRx Med. 2025;6:e65565. [CrossRef]

    ‎
    AI: artificial intelligence

    Edited by Ching Nam Hang, Edward Meinert, Tiffany Leung; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 03.12.24; accepted 03.12.24; published 20.02.25.

    Copyright

    ©Sai Saripalli. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 20.2.2025.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.