This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Peer Reviews (208)

Published on in Vol 3, No 3 (2022): Jul-Sep

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40574, first published .
Peer Review of “Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre-Post Quality Improvement Intervention”

Peer Review of “Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre-Post Quality Improvement Intervention”

Peer Review of “Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre-Post Quality Improvement Intervention”

Authors of this article:

Anonymous1
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Peer-Review Report


    This is a peer-review report submitted for the paper “Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre-Post Quality Improvement Intervention.”


    I have completed the statistical review of this manuscript [1], which is well-organized and presented. However, the following suggestions will help improve the quality of this manuscript.

    1. Is it a proof-of-concept–type study? Kindly add the time period of this study.
    2. Kindly do not use word “subjects” for study participants. You can simply use either “participants” or “patients.”
    3. No power calculation rationale was provided in this report, so these results cannot be generalized.
    4. Authors must include statements regarding the statistical software to perform data analysis and what level of statistical significance was used for hypothesis testing.
    5. Authors must add more clarity to the “Logistic regression with reported…” statement as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals are calculated from the logistic regression. What is the point of margins plot in this case? What other covariate were adjusted in the logistic
    6. Table 1, the cohabiting group can be merged with the married group. Add “years” in brackets next to “Age.” Arrival time can also be sensibly presented with fewer meaningful categories.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Mbwogge M, Astbury N, Nkumbe HE, Bunce C, Bascaran C. Waiting time and patient satisfaction in a subspecialty eye hospital using a mobile data collection kit: pre-post quality improvement intervention. JMIRx Med 2022;3(3):e34263 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]

    Edited by E Meinert; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 27.06.22; accepted 27.06.22; published 09.08.22

    Copyright

    © Anonymous. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 09.08.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.