This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

#xGeneticandGenomicMedicine (5) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (591) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (695) Electronic Health Records (1068) Precision Medicine and Genetics (48) User-centred Design Case Studies (602) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (880) Participatory Design and Participatory Research (333) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (787)

Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29706, first published .
Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet

Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet

Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet

Authors of this article:

Diane M Korngiebel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kathleen McGlone West1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Leapman M, Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Seibert T, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Loeb S, Schulman‐Green D. Patient experiences with tissue‐based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJUI Compass 2024;5(1):142 View
  2. Keefe A. First a Provider, Now a Patient: Receiving a Devastating Diagnosis Through the Patient Portal. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 2024;196(2-3) View