This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Peer Reviews (302)

Published on in Vol 7 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/91443, first published .
Peer Review for “Administration Technique of Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays Among Nepali Pharmacists: Cross-Sectional Study”

Peer Review for “Administration Technique of Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays Among Nepali Pharmacists: Cross-Sectional Study”

Peer Review for “Administration Technique of Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays Among Nepali Pharmacists: Cross-Sectional Study”

Authors of this article:

Ravi P Shankar1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics


    This is a peer-review report for “Administration Technique of Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays Among Nepali Pharmacists: Cross-Sectional Study.”


    General Comments

    This is an important and well-written study [1]. My suggestions are listed below.

    Specific Comments

    There are some problems with language and with unnecessary capitalization of words.

    Page 3: INCS sprays should be defined in full on first mention in the text.

    Page 8: Can details of the ethical committee that provided the approval be provided?

    Was the informed consent obtained in writing?

    Scoring system: Should the crucial steps not be provided with greater marks compared to the other steps?

    Page 17: Please explain the classification tree (Chi-square automatic interaction detection method) for the benefit of the readers.

    Page 17: “This research is one of a kind, conducted in Nepal.” Can this sentence be modified?

    Page 19: Instead of continuing medical education (CME), continuing pharmacy education (CPE) may be a better term.

    Page 20: What educational aids are you referring to?

    Are the educational leaflets available in the Nepali language?

    Page 20: “In our study, both the increasing age (>26 y old) were significantly associated with improved INCS [intranasal corticosteroid] counseling proficiency.” This sentence mentions both but then highlights only one factor.

    Was this study conducted only in Kathmandu city and not in Lalitpur or Bhaktapur?

    Page 21, Limitations section: Some of the findings may be extreme due to small subgroups or model overfitting. Can this be explained?

    Different fonts are used in different locations, and this should be corrected.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Chaudhary AP, Thakur S, Sah SK. Administration technique of intranasal corticosteroid sprays among Nepali pharmacists: cross-sectional study. JMIRx Med. 2026;7:e83042. [CrossRef]

    Edited by Amy Schwartz; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 14.Jan.2026; accepted 14.Jan.2026; published 29.Jan.2026.

    Copyright

    © Ravi P Shankar. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 29.Jan.2026.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.