Authors’ Response to Peer-Review Reports: https://med.jmirx.org/2026/1/e89710
Published Article: https://med.jmirx.org/2026/1/e57021
doi:10.2196/89735
Keywords
This is the peer-review report for “Use of a Specialist Telephone Consultation Line for Long COVID in Primary Care in British Columbia: Retrospective Descriptive Quality Improvement Study.”
Round 1 Review
General Comments
This paper [] is structured well, with an analysis of the data obtained. The authors need to present how this data will assist the province with some figures or data.
Specific Comments
Major Comments
- The authors mention that 6 calls were excluded but never gave an analysis of the trend of the calls.
- Can the 6 calls drive some conclusions that can assist with the paper?
- Can the authors give a trend line for the period of these calls and if there are related cases of different calls?
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Reference
- Kaushal S, Bhandal J, Birks P, et al. Use of a Specialist Telephone Consultation Line for Long COVID in Primary Care in British Columbia: Retrospective Descriptive Quality Improvement Study. JMIRx Med. 2026;7:e57021. [CrossRef]
Edited by Amy Schwartz; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 16.Dec.2025; accepted 16.Dec.2025; published 10.Feb.2026.
Copyright© Saidi Olayinka Olalere. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 10.Feb.2026.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
