Authors' Response to Peer-Review Reports https://med.jmirx.org/2025/1/e69537
Published Article https://med.jmirx.org/2025/1/e65565
doi:10.2196/69870
Keywords
This is the peer-review report for “Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study.”
Round 1 Review
General Comments
This paper [
] construct a checklist to support the development and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical settings. I only have some minor comments.Minor Comments
1. Comparison with existing checklists: Please add a comparison with some of the existing checklists.
2. Inconsistency in the number of studies: The authors initially stated that they included 20 studies, but later mentioned 23. Please clarify.
3. Appendix visibility: The appendix is not visible.
4. Abbreviation consistency: The abbreviation “IQR” appears multiple times. Please ensure it is clearly defined and used consistently.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Reference
- Owoyemi A, Osuchukwu J, Salwei ME, Boyd A. Checklist approach to developing and implementing AI in clinical settings: instrument development study. JMIRx Med. 2025;6:e65565. [CrossRef]
Abbreviations
AI: artificial intelligence |
Edited by Ching Nam Hang, Edward Meinert, Tiffany Leung; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 10.12.24; accepted 10.12.24; published 20.02.25.
Copyright© Anonymous. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 20.2.2025.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.