<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.0 20040830//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="2.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">JMIRx Med</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">xmed</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="index">34</journal-id><journal-title>JMIRx Med</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JMIRx Med</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2563-6316</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">56759</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/56759</article-id><title-group><article-title>Dental Tissue Density in Healthy Children Based on Radiological Data: Retrospective Analysis</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Reshetnikov</surname><given-names>Aleksey</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shaikhattarova</surname><given-names>Natalia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mazurok</surname><given-names>Margarita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kasatkina</surname><given-names>Nadezhda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Oral Surgery, Resto Dental Clinic Ltd</institution>, <addr-line>Izhevsk</addr-line>, <country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Department of Dentistry, Lobachevsky State University</institution>, <addr-line>Nizhny Novgorod</addr-line>, <country>Russian Federation</country></aff><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meinert</surname><given-names>Edward</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Fuqing</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>Tiffany</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gorthy</surname><given-names>Shanmukha</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anonymous</surname><given-names/></name></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp>Correspondence to Margarita Mazurok<email>docmazurok1@gmail.com</email></corresp><fn fn-type="equal" id="equal-contrib1"><label>*</label><p>these authors contributed equally</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>6</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><elocation-id>e56759</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></date></history><copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Aleksey Reshetnikov, Natalia Shaikhattarova, Margarita Mazurok, Nadezhda Kasatkina. Originally published in JMIRx Med (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://med.jmirx.org">https://med.jmirx.org</ext-link>), 20.6.2024. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://med.jmirx.org/">https://med.jmirx.org/</ext-link>, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.</p></license><self-uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://xmed.jmir.org/2024/1/e56759"/><related-article related-article-type="companion" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.2196/preprints.56759" xlink:title="Preprint (JMIR Preprints)" xlink:type="simple">https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/56759</related-article><related-article related-article-type="companion" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1101/2024.01.11.24301001" xlink:title="Preprint (medrxiv)" xlink:type="simple">https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.11.24301001v1</related-article><related-article related-article-type="companion" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.2196/60329" xlink:title="Peer-Review Report by Shanmukha Gorthy (Reviewer E)" xlink:type="simple">https://med.jmirx.org/2024/1/e60329</related-article><related-article related-article-type="companion" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.2196/62676" xlink:title="Peer-Review Report by Anonymous" xlink:type="simple">https://med.jmirx.org/2024/1/e62676</related-article><abstract><sec><title>Background</title><p>Information about the range of Hounsfield values for healthy teeth tissues could become an additional tool in assessing dental health and could be used, among other data, for subsequent machine learning.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>The purpose of our study was to determine dental tissue densities in Hounsfield units (HU).</p></sec><sec sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><p>The total sample included 36 healthy children (n=21, 58% girls and n=15, 42% boys) aged 10-11 years at the time of the study. The densities of 320 teeth tissues were analyzed. Data were expressed as means and SDs. The significance was determined using the Student (1-tailed) <italic>t</italic> test. The statistical significance was set at <italic>P</italic>&#x003C;.05.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>The densities of 320 teeth tissues were analyzed: 72 (22.5%) first permanent molars, 72 (22.5%) permanent central incisors, 27 (8.4%) second primary molars, 40 (12.5%) tooth germs of second premolars, 37 (11.6%) second premolars, 9 (2.8%) second permanent molars, and 63 (19.7%) tooth germs of second permanent molars. The analysis of the data showed that tissues of healthy teeth in children have different density ranges: enamel, from mean 2954.69 (SD 223.77) HU to mean 2071.00 (SD 222.86) HU; dentin, from mean 1899.23 (SD 145.94) HU to mean 1323.10 (SD 201.67) HU; and pulp, from mean 420.29 (SD 196.47) HU to mean 183.63 (SD 97.59) HU. The tissues (enamel and dentin) of permanent central incisors in the mandible and maxilla had the highest mean densities. No gender differences concerning the density of dental tissues were reliably identified.</p></sec><sec sec-type="conclusions"><title>Conclusions</title><p>The evaluation of Hounsfield values for dental tissues can be used as an objective method for assessing their densities. If the determined densities of the enamel, dentin, and pulp of the tooth do not correspond to the range of values for healthy tooth tissues, then it may indicate a pathology.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>density</kwd><kwd>teeth</kwd><kwd>tooth</kwd><kwd>dental</kwd><kwd>dentist</kwd><kwd>dentists</kwd><kwd>dentistry</kwd><kwd>oral</kwd><kwd>tissue</kwd><kwd>enamel</kwd><kwd>dentin</kwd><kwd>Hounsfield</kwd><kwd>pathology</kwd><kwd>pathological</kwd><kwd>radiology</kwd><kwd>radiological</kwd><kwd>image</kwd><kwd>images</kwd><kwd>imaging</kwd><kwd>teeth density</kwd><kwd>Hounsfield unit</kwd><kwd>diagnostic imaging</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Healthy hard and soft dental tissues determine the quality of human life. Nowadays, there are various methods of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental studies that allow us not only to assess the initial condition of hard and soft tooth tissues but also to evaluate their change during therapeutic and preventive procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>]. Dynamic monitoring of dental tissue condition is required in trauma, after transplantation, and during therapeutic and preventive procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>]. It is especially important in children with metabolic diseases, genetic abnormalities, and special needs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>]. The emergence of innovative diagnostic methods provides dentists with new opportunities to assess dental health, especially in the early stages of pathological changes that are not visible to the eye. Recently, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been widely used in dentistry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>]. Unlike traditional orthopantomograms, CBCT allows the clinician to analyze tissue density using Hounsfield units (HU) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>]. Information about the range of Hounsfield values for healthy teeth tissues could become an additional tool in assessing dental health, age estimation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>], and anatomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>] and could be used, among other data, for subsequent machine learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>]. The results of earlier studies do not provide convincing data on the range of Hounsfield values for healthy dental tissues in children of a certain age group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>]. Our study is aimed at establishing the Hounsfield values of dental tissue density in children in the same age group.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Ethical Considerations</title><p>The study was conducted at Resto Dental Clinic Ltd, Izhevsk, Russia, from January 2021 to January 2023. The study protocol complied with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Health Organization and was approved by the Ethics Committees at Resto Dental Clinic Ltd (protocol 07; December 22, 2020). Informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all children in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Participants</title><p>The study included 36 children aged 10&#x2010;11 years of both genders. The criteria for including children in the study were (1) the presence of medical indications for CBCT (malocclusion and dental structural anomalies in the primary and permanent dentition, dental trauma, or anomalies in dental position), (2) aged over 10 years, (3) consent to the study, and (4) the absence of genetic anomalies and concomitant diseases.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Procedures</title><p>This study was not a randomized controlled trial and was therefore not registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Before CBCT, all participants underwent a clinical study with a visual-tactile method. CBCT studies were performed using a PlanmecaProMax 3D tomograph (Planmeca Oy) with scanning parameters of 88 kV, 5 mA, and 15 seconds. Only 1 expert clinician performed the measurements. PlanmecaRomexis 5.2.R 24.10.18 software (Planmeca Oy) was used to analyze the data obtained. The average dental tissue density was determined over an area of 1 mm<sup>2</sup>. Teeth tissues of the upper and lower jaws that were selected for the study included first permanent molars, permanent central incisors, second primary molars, tooth germs of second premolars, second premolars, second permanent molars, and tooth germs of second permanent molars. Teeth enamel and dentin densities were measured in HU on the incisor or occlusal surface (enamel 1 and dentin 1) and proximal surface (enamel 2 and dentin 2). Pulp density was measured in its central area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><fig position="float" id="figure1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Measuring the radiodensity (in Hounsfield units) of a first permanent molar of a boy (10 years old) under cone-beam computed tomography. H: height; W: width.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="xmed_v5i1e56759_fig01.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Data Analysis</title><p>Data were expressed as means and SDs. The significance was determined using the Student (1-tailed) <italic>t</italic> test. The statistical significance was set at <italic>P</italic>&#x003C;.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s3-1"><title>Baseline Characteristics</title><p>The total sample consisted of 36 healthy children (n=21, 58% girls and n=15, 42% boys) aged 10&#x2010;11 years at the time of the study. The densities of 320 teeth tissues were analyzed: 72 (22.5%) first permanent molars, 72 (22.5%) permanent central incisors, 27 (8.4%) second primary molars, 40 (12.5%) tooth germs of second premolars, 37 (11.6%) second premolars, 9 (2.8%) second permanent molars, and 63 (19.7%) tooth germs of second permanent molars.</p></sec><sec id="s3-2"><title>Dental Tissue Densities</title><p>The analysis of the data showed that tissues of healthy teeth in children have different density ranges: enamel, from mean 2954.69 (SD 223.77) HU to mean 2071.00 (SD 222.86) HU; dentin, from mean 1899.23 (SD 145.94) HU to mean 1323.10 (SD 201.67) HU; and pulp, from mean 420.29 (SD 196.47) HU to mean 183.63 (SD 97.59) HU. The statistical analysis did not reveal any significant relationships between Hounsfield values and demographic data (gender). Therefore, the densities of the tissues of the maxilla and mandible teeth were compared. Detailed data are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The tissues (enamel and dentin) of permanent central incisors in the mandible and maxilla had the highest mean densities. The enamel and dentin densities of the second primary molars were significantly lower than those for second permanent molars and tooth germs of second permanent molars (all <italic>P</italic>&#x003C;.05).</p><table-wrap id="t1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Dental tissue densities of healthy children in Hounsfield units.</p></caption><table id="table1" frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Teeth tissues and jaw</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Enamel 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Enamel 2</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Dentin 1</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Dentin 2</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>First permanent molars</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=36), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2426.28 (168.41)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2358.81 (219.60)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1561.17 (143.59)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1584.11 (137.17)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=36), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2414.53 (194.85)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2336.39 (171.98)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1537.50 (150.25)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1487.19 (189.15)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn1">a</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top">0.2699 (70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.4756 (70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.6738 (70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.4543 (70)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn2">b</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0003</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0003</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0003</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0003</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>Permanent central incisors</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=36), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2954.69 (223.77)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2592.54 (186.54)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1796.40 (163.39)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1791.91 (127.94)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=36), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2984.20 (223.44)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2552.37 (186.85)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1899.23 (145.94)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1871.69 (98.81)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.5521 (70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.9001 (70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.7769 (70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.9202 (70)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0003</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0003</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0003</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0003</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>Second primary molars</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=16), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2141.75 (246.70)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2228.53 (160.24)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1428.06 (203.41)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1413.21 (145.79)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=11), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2227.09 (115.66)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2071.00 (222.86)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1323.10 (201.67)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1434.50 (144.22)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.2045 (25)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.9976 (25)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.2867 (25)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.355 (25)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0595</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0639</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0639</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0739</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>Tooth germs of second premolars</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=21), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2449.71 (181.11)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2509.62 (221.56)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1576.48 (126.62)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1649.71 (128.85)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=19), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2583.68 (134.75)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2611.32 (181.89)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1666.42 (138.10)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1695.74 (108.76)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.6698 (38)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.5923 (38)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.1394 (38)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.2245 (38)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0211</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0211</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0211</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0211</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>Second premolars</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=20), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2220.58 (190.65)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2301.32 (193.38)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1417.30 (119.57)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1507.85 (171.50)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=17), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2336.94 (218.79)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2348.18 (103.87)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1337.00 (170.81)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1375.18 (126.17)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.7094 (35)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.9365 (35)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.6285 (35)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.7042 (35)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0211</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0211</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0211</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0211</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>Second permanent molars</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=4), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2350.00 (49.02)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2403.50 (101.93)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1569.00 (88.75)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1523.25 (91.31)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=5), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2293.40 (131.28)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2174.40 (145.79)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1443.00 (70.81)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1327.60 (121.99)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.8897 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.7734 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.3111 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.7502 (7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.3646</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.3646</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.3646</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.3646</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6"><bold>Tooth germs of second permanent molars</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Maxilla (n=32), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2359.03 (169.39)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2403.16 (209.89)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1527.03 (121.39)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1519.66 (105.13)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Mandible (n=31), mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2356.52 (148.88)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2499.97 (178.51)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1527.81 (128.91)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1554.37 (120.88)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> test (<italic>df</italic>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.0625 (61)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.9741 (61)</td><td align="left" valign="top">0.0247 (61)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1.2031 (61)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top"><italic>t</italic> critical value</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.0423</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0423</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0423</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">2.0423</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table1fn1"><p><sup>a</sup>The differences are significant when <italic>t</italic> test value&#x003E;<italic>t</italic> critical value at <italic>P</italic>=.05.</p></fn><fn id="table1fn2"><p><sup>b</sup><italic>t</italic> critical value at <italic>P</italic>=.05.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Principal Findings</title><p>The densities of dental tissues are an independent sign of their health. With the development of computed tomography and software, clinicians acquired an additional tool for analyzing the density of dental tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>]. The determination of Hounsfield values of dental tissues using CBCT can be used as an objective method for assessing their densities in people of different age groups. We obtained the measurements of tissue densities of healthy teeth in children aged 10&#x2010;11 years.</p><p>Previous studies of extracted teeth using microcomputed tomography showed uneven distribution of enamel and dentin densities in different areas of the tooth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>]. Yavuz et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>] confirmed this pattern in a mixed-age population using CBCT in their study. However, the densities of enamel and dentin in their study were lower than the average values obtained during our study. One of the reasons justifying this difference may be the fact that our study included children in the same age group, which may justify further studies on the dental tissue density in a population of children and adults of certain age groups. The obtained densities for the tissues of teeth germs indicate that they correspond to the densities of permanent teeth and exceed similar indicators of the densities of primary teeth tissues.</p><p>We believe that further research on the density range for healthy and pathologically altered dental tissues, as well as study standardization, can help clinicians improve the accuracy of screening and optimize subsequent monitoring of the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic procedures in the future. This study is an attempt to establish the range of Hounsfield values for healthy maxillary and mandibular dental tissues in children of a certain age group. The data obtained revealed the densities for enamel, dentin, and pulp for primary and permanent teeth and germs of primary teeth. Differences in the densities of specific teeth were also revealed; in particular, it was found that the enamel of the incisors had the highest density, significantly exceeding the densities of the molars. Further research on the densities of dental tissues in normal and pathological conditions seems promising, in particular for machine learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Limitations</title><p>A limitation of our study was that measurements were carried out by only 1 expert clinician, which eliminates an assessment of interobserver variability. The study was conducted in a population of children in the same age group. In addition, not all maxillary and mandibular teeth were included in the study. This study only obtained Hounsfield values of dental structures from 1 particularly used CBCT machine. Further studies on a larger population may be useful to improve the information content of the data.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Conclusions</title><p>The evaluation of Hounsfield values of dental tissues can be used as an objective method for assessing their densities. If the determined densities of the enamel, dentin, and pulp of the tooth do not correspond to the range of values for healthy tooth tissues, then it may indicate a pathology.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack><p>The authors acknowledge and thank Professor Aleksandr Urakov (from Izhevsk State Medical Academy) for all the support.</p></ack><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>None declared.</p></fn></fn-group><glossary><title>Abbreviations</title><def-list><def-item><term id="abb1">CBCT</term><def><p>cone-beam computed tomography</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb2">HU</term><def><p>Hounsfield units</p></def></def-item></def-list></glossary><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Warreth</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Dental caries and its management</article-title><source>Int J Dent</source><year>2023</year><month>01</month><volume>2023</volume><fpage>9365845</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2023/9365845</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36636170</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anauate-Netto</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Borelli Neto</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Amore</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Di Hip&#x00F3;lito</surname><given-names>V</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>D&#x2019;Alpino</surname><given-names>PHP</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Caries progression in non-cavitated fissures after infiltrant application: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial</article-title><source>J Appl Oral Sci</source><year>2017</year><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>442</fpage><lpage>454</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0633</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">28877284</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elgezawi</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Haridy</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdalla</surname><given-names>MA</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Heck</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Draenert</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kaisarly</surname><given-names>D</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Current strategies to control recurrent and residual caries with resin composite restorations: operator- and material-related factors</article-title><source>J Clin Med</source><year>2022</year><month>11</month><day>7</day><volume>11</volume><issue>21</issue><fpage>6591</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm11216591</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36362817</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdou</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Matoug-Elwerfelli</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nagendrababu</surname><given-names>V</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nazzal</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Duggal</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Tooth auto-transplantation: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles</article-title><source>Dent Traumatol</source><year>2023</year><month>02</month><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>64</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/edt.12779</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">35972826</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>JS</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pang</surname><given-names>NS</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Importance of photography education to improve image quality for accurate remote diagnoses in dental trauma patients: observational study</article-title><source>JMIR Mhealth Uhealth</source><year>2020</year><month>03</month><day>26</day><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>e15152</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/15152</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">32213475</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Su</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>The dental phenotype of primary dentition in SATB2-associated syndrome: a report of three cases and literature review</article-title><source>BMC Oral Health</source><year>2022</year><month>11</month><day>22</day><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>522</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12903-022-02594-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36457071</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patni</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CT</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Factors for poor oral health in long-term childhood cancer survivors</article-title><source>BMC Oral Health</source><year>2023</year><month>02</month><day>4</day><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>73</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12903-023-02762-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36739372</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pecci-Lloret</surname><given-names>MR</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pecci-Lloret</surname><given-names>MP</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Lozano</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Special care patients and caries prevalence in permanent dentition: a systematic review</article-title><source>Int J Environ Res Public Health</source><year>2022</year><month>11</month><day>17</day><volume>19</volume><issue>22</issue><fpage>15194</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph192215194</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36429911</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pauwels</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jacobs</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Singer</surname><given-names>SR</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mupparapu</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?</article-title><source>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</source><year>2015</year><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>20140238</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1259/dmfr.20140238</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25315442</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shapurian</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Damoulis</surname><given-names>PD</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Reiser</surname><given-names>GM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Griffin</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Rand</surname><given-names>WM</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index</article-title><source>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2006</year><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>290</fpage><lpage>297</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">16634501</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mathur</surname><given-names>VP</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dhillon</surname><given-names>JK</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Logani</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kalra</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of indirect pulp capping using three different materials: a randomized control trial using cone-beam computed tomography</article-title><source>Indian J Dent Res</source><year>2016</year><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>623</fpage><lpage>629</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/0970-9290.199588</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">28169260</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yousefi</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammadi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmadvand</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Razaghi</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Dental age estimation using cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>Imaging Sci Dent</source><year>2023</year><month>06</month><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5624/isd.20221226</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">37405204</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>JC</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Candemil</surname><given-names>AP</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bertolini</surname><given-names>GR</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the root canal anatomy of the lower premolars and molars in a Brazilian sub-population</article-title><source>Imaging Sci Dent</source><year>2023</year><month>03</month><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5624/isd.20220204</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">37006788</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hung</surname><given-names>KF</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ai</surname><given-names>QYH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>YY</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yeung</surname><given-names>AWK</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Potential and impact of artificial intelligence algorithms in dento-maxillofacial radiology</article-title><source>Clin Oral Investig</source><year>2022</year><month>09</month><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>5535</fpage><lpage>5555</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00784-022-04477-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">35438326</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yavuz</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Akleyin</surname><given-names>E</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Do&#x011F;an</surname><given-names>MS</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Goncharuk-Khomyn</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Akkus</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Can the density of mineralized dental tissues (dentin and enamel) be measured and compared with 3D cone beam computed tomography in cases of ectodermal dysplasia?</article-title><source>Med Sci Monit</source><year>2022</year><month>07</month><day>1</day><volume>28</volume><fpage>e937003</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12659/MSM.937003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">35773958</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hayashi-Sakai</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sakamoto</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hayashi</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of permanent and primary enamel and dentin mineral density using micro-computed tomography</article-title><source>Oral Radiol</source><year>2019</year><month>01</month><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11282-018-0315-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30484178</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>He</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ng Yin Ling</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nusinovici</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Development and external validation of machine learning models for diabetic microvascular complications: cross-sectional study with metabolites</article-title><source>J Med Internet Res</source><year>2024</year><month>03</month><day>28</day><volume>26</volume><fpage>e41065</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/41065</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">38546730</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>