JMIRxMed JMIRx Med JMIRx Med 2563-6316 JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada v3i3e39860 10.2196/39860 Peer-Review Report Peer-Review Report Peer Review of “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks” Meinert Edward Anonymous Jul-Sep 2022 1 7 2022 3 3 e39860 25 5 2022 25 5 2022 © Anonymous. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 01.07.2022. 2022

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.16.20101881v1 https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/34979 https://med.jmirx.org/2022/3/e40158/ https://med.jmirx.org/3/e34979/ physician suicide suicide suicide prevention physician well-being physician mental health nanopublication physician doctor mental health semantic publishing bibliometrics claim network information distortion misinformation

This is a peer-review report submitted for the paper “Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks.”

Round 1 Review General Comments

This paper [1] tries to address a myth that has been and continues to be perpetuated around the number of US physician suicides. It tries to put forward an approach to addressing myths in a way to better inform specific populations (ie, in this case, physicians) of the reality of suicide in the profession.

 Specific Comments Major Comments

1. This is an important effort and should be applauded.

2. This confirms that the myth remains in existence, despite minor changes to it, and should be either verified or dispelled.

3. The approach presented to address situations as described is one that has merit and can be useful to many where there is interest and desire. The paper was well written, clear, data driven, and of a good length. I would have liked a bit more in the discussion section (eg, implications could be stronger) and a simple conclusion statement at the end.

None declared.

 Leung TI Kuhn T Dumontier M Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications: Proof-of-Concept Study Creating Claim Networks JMIRx Med 2022 3 3 e34979 10.2196/34979