JMIRxMed JMIRx Med JMIRx Med 2563-6316 JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada v2i4e34107 10.2196/34107 Peer-Review Report Peer-Review Report Peer Review of “Information Technology Ambidexterity, Digital Dynamic Capability, and Knowledge Processes as Enablers of Patient Agility: Empirical Study” Meinert Edward Adeleke Ibrahim Taiwo MSc 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9118-2089 Health Records Federal Medical Centre Bida Nigeria Oct-Dec 2021 6 12 2021 2 4 e34107 6 10 2021 6 10 2021 ©Ibrahim Taiwo Adeleke. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 06.12.2021. 2021

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.20.21260841v1 https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/32336 https://med.jmirx.org/2021/4/e34106/ https://med.jmirx.org/2021/4/e32336/ IT ambidexterity dynamic capabilities digital dynamic capability knowledge processes patient agility hospitals information sciences information technology digital health health care digital transformation research models

This is a peer-review report submitted for the paper “Information Technology Ambidexterity, Digital Dynamic Capability, and Knowledge Processes as Enablers of Patient Agility: Empirical Study”

Round 1 Review Specific Comments Major Comments

Methods

Describe the study [1] settings

Move the highlighted (in the reviewed manuscript) content under Data Collection Procedures to a new subsection under subsection heading Study Population (see comments in the reviewed manuscript)

The highlighted content should be under a new subsection heading Study Design

Provide content on another two subsection headings:

Sampling Techniques

Sample Size

Separate content under Data Collection Procedure into two new subsection headings

Data Collection Tool and Procedure

Data Analysis and Management

Move Table 1 to Analyses & Results section

Provide content under two new subsection headings:

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Ethics Considerations

 Minor Comments

Abstract

Do not begin a sentence with abbreviation of figure

Use past tense under Methods (eg, consider ‘used’ in lieu of ‘uses’)

See comments in the reviewed manuscript

Introduction

Use physicians in lieu of doctors

Use health care providers not other medical professionals

Keep in-text citation to the end of sentence

Add health information management professionals among the key stakeholders

Consider reducing the whole of section 2 (Theoretical Background) to 1-2 paragraphs and keep it within the Introduction section just before your study objective. This is to reduce readers’ boredom.

Compress the content under research models and hypotheses

Results

Make your findings more visible here

Make your writing more readable to known and unknown readers

Discussion

Plausible and insightful discussion but not a reflection of the content under the Results. Make the Results section more readable and meaningful to your audience.

Figure

Use Fig not Figure

Acknowledgement

It is scientifically necessary that you acknowledge the numerous (n=107) participants, who are the major stakeholders in your research.

Reference

List at least 3 authors before et al

Follow the Referencing Style consistently

Others

Use participants not respondents

None declared.

 van de Wetering R Versendaal J Information technology ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability, and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: empirical study JMIRx Med 2021 2 4 e32336 10.2196/32336