This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
This paper [
I think the paper would benefit from focusing on the central point, with only a minor description of any methods necessary to make that point. For example, most of section 2 (“On the Nature of the Observed Data”) includes a lengthy description of the use of moving averages and R2 values, which readers can be expected to understand (and those who do not could learn via appropriate citations). Certainly, the formula for R2 is not necessary to include. These types of revisions would make the paper a more readable length.
The authors claim the Chinese epidemic cycle has a Gaussian shape, but even in their own drawing it appears much more like a gamma distribution (as would be expected) than Gaussian. They may want to reconsider this section.
The crux of this paper seems to be looking for epidemic curves that appear similarly shaped in various countries, and using that to predict the curves for countries where the cycle has not yet reached what the authors term the “MLCE end.” I have never heard of epidemic predictions using a method such as this, and it seems there are many far superior methods for estimating trajectory, so this is a curious choice.
Citations require appropriate formatting for journal publications.
None declared.